TYC
Automotive Lighting
Compare TYC to the Competition
A step-by-step comparison of D.O.T. Legal TYC lights against the competition

Design: TYC employs engineers and CAD artists, using the latest computer aided software to come up with numerous design concepts from which one winner will be chosen that's the most innovative. The idea is not just to follow the design that's currently on the market, but to set a new trend for others to follow. TYC is used to being an industry leader, and the aftermarket custom lamp is no exception.
The alternative: Our competitors take one design from the market and apply it to every vehicle lamp that they make. They are quicker in terms of speed but the designs are all one style or what they call "cookie cutter". This same style when used by consumers will make them lose the uniqueness if everybody has the same look.
Tooling: TYC uses the best tooling/mould for the plastic injection of lamp components. These toolings are made from high grade metal that are extremely hard, causing a longer development time but also the most consistent shape, form and quality in future production runs.
The alternative: Our competitors use lower grade toolings/moulds that are cheaper but faster to develop. These softer metals lose their shape after limited production runs, resulting in distorted shapes and form that fit badly on vehicles.
Equipment: TYC uses the latest and most high-tech equipment in the production process. These machines requires huge investments but the end-result is faster, more efficient and more consistent lamp productions.
The alternative: Some competitors use older equipment in their production process. The difference is plain to see when you compare a Pentium IV computer to a 486 Chip computer.
Testing: Before a TYC product is shipped out, it has undergone tons of testing to ensure that a quality product reaches the hands of the consumer. Testing during development and design stages ensures that fitment is absolutely perfect. Photometric testing ensures that the lamp complies to SAE/DOT regulations. Simulated rain, shock, humidity, and bulb life tests are conducted to ensure durability and reliability during extreme whether conditions. Transit testing ensures that the lamps have adequate protection from shipping damage, reaching the end-user in pristine condition. All of these tests are done in-house at TYC, with the most up-to-date facilities.
The alternative: Our competitors, to save costs in order to earn higher profit margins, do not conduct all of the above tests. The most important of which is the photometric testing. These requirements exist to ensure public and driver safety, but some do not even have a photometric testing lab in-house, severely limiting their ability to conduct tests.

So what's the verdict? TYC, when compared with the alternative, is like a Tag Huer vs. a Swatch. Which would you prefer?